By E. Grim. Lourdes College. 2018.
Although it has been found that people with higher emotional intelligence are  also healthier (Martins order 400mg trental overnight delivery, Ramalho generic 400 mg trental with amex, & Morin order 400 mg trental, 2010), findings are mixed about whether emotional intelligence  predicts life success—for instance, job performance (Harms & Credé, 2010). Furthermore, other researchers have questioned the construct validity of the measures, arguing that emotional intelligence really measures knowledge  about what emotions are, but not necessarily how to use those emotions (Brody, 2004), and that emotional intelligence is actually a personality trait, a part of g, or a skill that can be applied in some specific work situations—  for instance, academic and work situations (Landy, 2005). Although measures of the ability to understand, experience, and manage emotions may not predict effective behaviors, another important aspect of emotional intelligence—emotion regulation—does. Emotion regulation refers to the ability to control and productively use one‘s emotions. Research has found that people who are better able to override their impulses to seek immediate gratification and who are less impulsive also have higher cognitive and social intelligence. Because emotional intelligence seems so important, many school systems have designed programs to teach it to their students. However, the effectiveness of these programs has not been rigorously tested, and we do not yet know whether emotional intelligence can be taught, or if learning it would improve the quality of people‘s lives (Mayer &  Cobb, 2000). People who are better able to regulate their behaviors and emotions are also more successful in their personal and social encounters. Give some examples of how emotional intelligence (or the lack of it) influences your everyday life and the lives of other people you know. A method of measuring the development of the intelligence of young children (3rd ed. Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history and bibliography. Our research program validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence: Reply to Gottfredson. Parameters of cortical interactions in subjects with high and low levels of verbal creativity. The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. Construct validation of the Sternberg Triarchic abilities test: Comment and reanalysis. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence. Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic rate following learning. The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: Following up the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? Cohort effects in cognitive development of children as revealed by cross-sectional sequences. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and health. Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta- analysis. Some historical and scientific issues related to research on emotional intelligence. Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood. Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system: The dynamics of delay of gratification. Explain how very high and very low intelligence is defined and what it means to have them.
Some feature detectors are tuned to selectively respond to particularly important objects generic trental 400 mg line, for instance discount 400mg trental overnight delivery, faces purchase 400 mg trental, smiles, and other parts of the body (Downing, Jiang, Shuman, & Kanwisher, Attributed to Charles Stangor Saylor. Perceiving Color It has been estimated that the human visual system can detect and discriminate among 7 million  color variations (Geldard, 1972), but these variations are all created by the combinations of the three primary colors: red, green, and blue. The shade of a color, known as hue, is conveyed by the wavelength of the light that enters the eye (we see shorter wavelengths as more blue and longer wavelengths as more red), and we detect brightness from the intensity or height of the wave (bigger or more intense waves are perceived as brighter). In his important research on color vision, Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894) theorized that color is perceived because the cones in the retina come in three types. One type of cone reacts primarily to blue light (short wavelengths), another reacts primarily to green light (medium Attributed to Charles Stangor Saylor. The visual cortex then detects and compares the strength of the signals from each of the three types of cones, creating the experience of color. According to this Young-Helmholtz trichromatic color theory, what color we see depends on the mix of the signals from the three types of cones. If the brain is receiving primarily red and blue signals, for instance, it will perceive purple; if it is receiving primarily red and green signals it will perceive yellow; and if it is receiving messages from all three types of cones it will perceive white. The different functions of the three types of cones are apparent in people who experience color blindness—the inability to detect either green and/or red colors. About 1 in 50 people, mostly men, lack functioning in the red- or green-sensitive cones, leaving them only able to experience either one or two colors (Figure 4. For one, although the color purple does appear to us as a mixing of red and blue, yellow does not appear to be a mix of red and green. And people with color blindness, who cannot see either green or red, nevertheless can still see yellow. An alternative approach to the Young-Helmholtz theory, known as the opponent-process color theory, proposes that we analyze sensory information not in terms of three colors but rather in three sets of “opponent colors‖: red-green, yellow-blue, and white- black. Evidence for the opponent-process theory comes from the fact that some neurons in the retina and in the visual cortex are excited by one color (e. Flag" for about 30 seconds (the longer you look, the better the effect), and then move your eyes to the blank area to the right of it, you will see the afterimage. When we stare at the green stripes, our green receptors habituate and begin to process less strongly, whereas the red receptors remain at full strength. Stare at the flag for a few seconds, and then move your gaze to the blank space next to it. The tricolor and the opponent-process mechanisms work together to produce color vision. When light rays enter the eye, the red, blue, and green cones on the retina respond in different degrees, and send different strength signals of red, blue, and green through the optic nerve. The color signals are then processed both by the ganglion cells and by the neurons in the visual cortex  (Gegenfurtner & Kiper, 2003). Perceiving Form One of the important processes required in vision is the perception of form. German psychologists in the 1930s and 1940s, including Max Wertheimer (1880–1943), Kurt Koffka (1886–1941), and Wolfgang Köhler (1887–1967), argued that we create forms out of their component sensations based on the idea of the gestalt, a meaningfully organized whole. We tend to group Do you see four or eight Proximity nearby figures images at right? The rather than in principle of continuity leads more us to see most lines as discontinuous following the smoothest Continuity ways. We tend to fill in Closure leads us to see a Closure gaps in an single spherical object at Figure 4. Perceiving Depth Depth perception is the ability to perceive three-dimensional space and to accurately judge distance. Without depth perception, we would be unable to drive a car, thread a needle, or simply  navigate our way around the supermarket (Howard & Rogers, 2001). Research has found that depth perception is in part based on innate capacities and in part learned through experience  (Witherington, 2005). The infants were placed on one side of the “cliff,‖ while their Attributed to Charles Stangor Saylor. Gibson and Walk found that most infants either crawled away from the cliff or remained on the board and cried because they wanted to go to their mothers, but the infants perceived a chasm that they instinctively could not cross. Further research has found that even very young children who cannot yet crawl are fearful of heights  (Campos, Langer, & Krowitz, 1970). On the other hand, studies have also found that infants improve their hand-eye coordination as they learn to better grasp objects and as they gain more  experience in crawling, indicating that depth perception is also learned (Adolph, 2000). Depth perception is the result of our use of depth cues, messages from our bodies and the external environment that supply us with information about space and distance. Binocular depth cues are depth cues that are created by retinal image disparity—that is, the space between our eyes, and thus which require the coordination of both eyes. One outcome of retinal disparity is that the images projected on each eye are slightly different from each other.